I didn't see the Democratic National Convention, but I was not surprised to learn Clinton didn't fan the coals of negative campaigning. In doing so, Clinton unequivocally went against the grain of the Democratic Party.
It's a smart move on the former President's part.
This country is becoming increasingly polarized by groups that promote and perpetuate hatred. It seems that anyone that's politically active runs by the worlds "an enemy of my enemy is my friend." As if to say, "hello stranger, you hate Bush! Great! You're my new best friend." Never mind the notion that the ignorant do-gooder may have just befriended a devout al-Qaeda member.
So here's the problem: a huge chunk of the American population is fed up this trend. Don't believe me? Then why is it that Kerry is having a heck of a time getting an edge in the polls even though Bush's approval ratings are so low? The swing voters and independents are not going to be lured over the Democratic party if all they can do is bash Bush.
Clinton knows this and is acting accordingly. Really, if anyone knows how to beat President Bush in the wake of an Iraqi war, it's him. So why is it that so few Democrats want to take their queue from Clinton?
Come on Democrats. It was an effective way to make one's self look better by cutting others down. The keyword here is WAS. That was back in junior high. True, cutting people down in campaigns in part of the game. But if that's your core strategy, you've got some big problems.
Tuesday, July 27, 2004
Bill Clinton vs. Every other Democrat
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment